Benchmarks: Battlefield 3, Crysis 3

The GTX Titan rendered an incredible 68fps at 2560x1600 in Battleground iii, just 2% slower than the Hd 7870 Crossfire duo and 6% slower than the GTX 660 Ti SLI combo while being 31% and 41% faster than the HD 7970 GHz Edition and GTX 680.

Despite being beaten by multi-GPU setups in average frame rates, the Titan fared meliorate than any other setup when measuring frame latencies, taking just 17.5ms on average when playing at 2560x1600 -- a hair improve than the GTX 660 Ti in SLI and significantly improve than the Crossfire setups, which are slower than what their average frame rates suggest. For instance, the dual Hard disk drive 7950s averaged 25.3ms, or 31% slower than the GTX Titan instead of 30% faster as the fps data implies.

As we found in our contempo performance review, squeezing 30fps out of Crysis 3 is no easy feat, especially at 2560x1600 on very high quality, but the Titan managed to deliver 31.1fps, topping the GTX 680 by 10% and the Hd 7970 GHz edition by 31%, though it was ix% slower than the GTX 660 Ti in SLI and xv% slower than the HD 7950 Boost in Crossfire.

The Titan gave solid frame time results again with 35.3ms, which was just slightly slower than the GTX 660 Ti SLI setup. After their lousy showing in Battlefield 3's latency test, the Crossfire setups redeemed themselves in Crysis three, with the Hd 7950 Boost falling only 1ms behind the Titan -- though it'southward worth noting again that the fps information pegged them every bit existence 17% faster.